Happy Holidays to all of you fans of slugs!
Although the site and the project are devoted to adorable molluscs, we would be nowhere without algae. These days, I spend more time and resources trying to acquire, grow, and identify algae than I do attending to Elysia. It should not be a surprise, given the outsize role of algae in the biology of the slugs, but, until this project was underway, I had never given a lot of thought to the care and diversity of algae. Subsequent posts will describe some of the progress in algae care, but today we’ll focus on some systematics and molecular biology.
The plant in the photo above has been nagging at me for well over a year. I can’t remember exactly how it came up, but KP Aquatics mentioned that they had a species of algae they called “spongy sea pansy,” which was like Udotea, but larger and squishier. They were quite a bit taller than Udotea, grew in clumps, and were indeed quite spongy. Their biology is somewhat different from other algae in the order, in that the thallus (the body of the alga) dies back periodically, and a new one grows from the rhizoid (the rootlike part). In my experience, species like Udotea or Penicillus send out runners that produce new thalli, and the old ones just die off.
I have been referring to them as Avrainvillea, because they fit the description reasonably well, but had never done the hard work of verifying that it was not a similarly squishy genus, such as Rhipilia or Cladocephalus.
A real phycologist (algae specialist) would have probably started with a good microscope and species key. I took the molecular route, since I was already using PCR to amplify DNA from the rbcL gene in a few other species, and sending it off for sequencing.
Because I was testing new PCR machines, I had set up three independent reactions, and the results were the same. The screenshot below shows the results of a BLAST search for one of the sequences through the NCBI database, with the closest match at the top. The second best, with 98% of the nucleotides being identical, is Avrainvillea nigricans. The best match (99%) is to an “uncultured Ulvophyceae” clone from a study by Christa, Gould, Wagele, and their collaborators. If I read the entry correctly, the sequence is from kleptoplasts extracted from Costasiella, a Caribbean slug that feeds on…did you guess…Avrainvillea. To provide a little context, Cladocephalus and Rhipilia, the genera that were possible candidates based on appearance, were only 93% and 82% identical, respectively.
That is a pretty clear-cut result. It looks like Avrainvillea, it is squishy like Avrainvillea, and its DNA is essentially an exact match for Avrainvillea nigricans. It is Avrainvillea.
As you’ll see in the next post, the results aren’t always so easy to interpret.
In the “one reefer’s pestilence is a slug’s tasty snack” department, Marcos from Exotic Reef Creations sent over a batch of rock and zoanthids and live rock that were covered with lush Bryopsis growth. Although the dedicated algae tanks have helped keep the supply up, I was very excited to receive the new infusion. The gals are over the moon about it. The photos below show the whole gang hunkered down in feeding posture. They have been face down in it for almost 24 hours now.
The goal is to have them clear the algae so the corals can go back home. It will be interesting to see how long that takes.
Meantime, the molecular experiments are moving along. More soon.
It is time to get the system up to full capacity. The last component, a half-height 10-gallon tank (yes, that’s really a 5-gallon tank for the mathematically inclined) is now in operation. Originally designed to be a nursery, it seemed better suited to use as a Bryopsis culturing tank. I have been pleased with growth rates under the Evergrow S2 hydropnics light, so I picked up another one from Exotic Reef Creations. So there are now two slug tanks and two algae tanks for the upcoming project. With the red light from the hydroponics lights and the green from the algae, one might be tempted to think it looks a little like Christmas around here.
Here’s a better view of the new algae tank, with eggcrate to acts as a substrate and a small Hydor propeller pump to provide current. Several of the original samples of Bryopsis had started growing in fellow aquarists coral propagation systems, and were provided conveniently mounted on “frag plugs” onto which fragments of coral colonies are normally glued to enable them to grow. In this case, the growth of the algae on the plugs allowed easy and stable placement in the eggcrate.
There have been a few other improvements as well. In November, I got the new Neptune Systems Apex controller hooked up. Although it is capable of much more, it is hooked up to monitor and log energy use, system pH, water temperature, air temperature (in case of failure of environmental controls in the building), and moisture on the floor. The unit controls all of the lights, pumps, chiller, and heater, and can, for example shut down the pumps automatically in case of a spill being detected. Further, the system is completely accessible through a cloud-based interface, which allows control while I am away from the office.
Along with keeping an eye on the system when I am away, the Apex provides a log of some parameters. For example, when all of the lights were on at the same time of day, pH fluctuated significantly. The upper plot in the graph show detail of pH rising from 8.1 in the early morning to 8.5 when the lights went out at the end of the day. Because CO2, which reduces pH through the formation of carbonic acid, is consumed during photosynthesis when the lights are on and builds up at night, it is not surprising that pH steadily rises during the day.
Although it did not seem to cause the plants or animals much stress, it seemed worth trying to reduce the fluctuation. Rather than having all lights on at the same time of day, I set the lights on the algae growth tank to be on during the night. In this way, photosynthesis would be relatively constant in the system over the course of the day, with the potential benefits of stabilizing pH and keeping consumption of nutrients relatively steady. I was pleasantly surprised to see the pH fluctuation reduced to between 8.25 and 8.35. Frankly, the livestock did not seem as excited as I was.
Finally, I added a small protein skimmer (a.k.a., foam fractionator) to remove microalgae and organic material from the water column. Some might argue that suspended material serves as a source of nutrients for the plants, but in my experience desirable algae and plants tend to outcompete nuisance algae when a skimmer is used. None of the the nutrients provided by the dosing system are removed by skimming, so the skimmer just removes the compounds that are not under my control. With the height restrictions of the sump, I went with a Reef Octopus BH50, which is designed for small systems. It has been easy to set up and adjust, and extracts significant amounts of smelly material every day.
For the next few weeks, we’ll be watching algae grow. After the holidays, it will be time to order up a batch of slugs for the next round of Slug Science!
As described in the last post, I was interested in improving the growth of the food plants. Among the many parameters to consider (spectrum and intensity of light, water flow, nutrients), I decided to systematically increase the nutrient levels by carefully dosing Guillard’s f/2 formula. I have been very pleased to see a significant improvement in color, growth rate and branchiness of the Bryopsis.
Previously, growth was unimpressive. The plants were pale and rangy, and I was becoming concerned that they would not ever grow enough to keep the slugs fed. In the photo below, the finer, fuzzier stuff is Derbesia, and the thicker strands are barely recognizable Bryopsis, which should be bushy and feathery. If you can’t figure out what Bryopsis should look like, it may help to read to the end of the post and then scroll back up here.
Within a few days, the Bryopsis started looking better. In the photo below, an astute viewer might be able to see that the tips of the branches are beginning to become a darker green. With the added nutrients, cyanobacteria (the red film coating some of the plants) have also increased. With a little adjustment of the dosing, I hope to see less red and more green.
In just over a week, growth is robust, color is a satisfying, deep green, and additional branches are starting to appear. At this point, I also changed the flow pattern a little to increase the current passing through this patch.
As of a few days ago, the plants are nice and green, and almost feathery. In addition, there are patches of new growth forming in areas of high flow, so the alga is spreading. At this point, NO3 levels are a little over 10 ppm, and PO4 is about 0.5. Over the next few weeks, I am going to try to bring the levels down a little bit to discourage cyanobacteria.
So what have we learned? First, a more balanced approach to feeding the algae results in faster growth and better color. Without systematic removals and subsitutions of components, it’s hard to know which of the ingredients was limiting for growth (N, P, Mg, Mn, Fe…..?), but the mix has quickly done the job. Second, based on the quality of the growth in areas of high flow, Bryopsis seems to like a lot of current. At present, I do not know which species I have (I hope that will change by the end of next semester), but some are found in intertidal zones with significant surf.
With these lessons in mind, I will be converting the nursery tank into a Bryopsis cultivation tank to provide food for the hungry Elysia that will arrive in a month or so for the student research project.
To possibly belabor a point, the limiting factor in slug husbandry seems to be food. So more, better food = more, better slugs?
Given how hard most aquarists work to eradicate nuisance algae, including the Bryopsis that Elysia clarki find irresistable, it would seem that growing algae should not be all that horribly challenging, right? One just needs good, strong light, plus some nutrients to support growth. The trick is to grow the species one wants, without having the cultures overtaken by undesirables. In my case, the “good” algae are Penicillus, Bryopsis, and, to a lesser extent, Derbesia, Halimeda, and Avrainvillea. The primary nuisance I am trying to avoid is “red slime” cyanobacteria, which can overtake and smother the other species.
Plants require nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous in significant quantities, along with smaller amounts of calcium, magnesium and sulfur . Based on my measurements, the desirable algae consumed considerable amounts of nitrate, but adding phosphate did not appear to encourage growth target algae and increased the growth of cyanobacteria. So, along with calcium (Penicillus and Halimeda use it for structural support) and bicarbonate (a pH buffer and source of carbon) I have been using the dosing system to add potassium nitrate in order to maintain nitrate at about 5-10 ppm. For everthing else, I have been relying on the artificial seawater mix to provide an adequate balance. Perhaps not the most systematic approach to feeding the plants.
It has, however, worked reasonably well. In the photos above, there is a dense growth of Penicillus on the right side of the Broodstock tank, and a mat of Derbesia and Bryopsis on the left. The resident E. clarki seem quite happy to spend their days grazing without exhausting the supply. The other tanks are similarly productive. Nonetheless, it might be possible to increase algae productivity, thereby increasing slug capacity and the frequency of mating and egg laying.
There is, of course, an actual literature on the nutrient requirements of aquatic plants. Some commonly used formulas rely on extraction of nutrients from soil to provide the correct balance of elements. I might have tried that had I been able to buy the correct brand of English planting soil. However, based on a number of studies (Kumar et al., 2011 e.g.) Guillard’s f/2 medium (Guillard, 1975) yields excellent growth of macroalgae and does not require purchasing and soaking British soil.
Florida Aqua Farms supplies Guillard’s f/2 medium under the name “Plant Fuel,” providing pre-measured dry ingredients along with a suggested dosing regimen. Seemed worth a try to find out whether more complete supplementation will translate into faster growth of desirable algae. What’s the worst that can happen, aside from massive bloom of toxic, undesirable algae?
The components arrived, I mixed them up, and the dosing system is adding 1 ml of f/2 per 2.5 liters of system volume, distributed over the course of each week. We’ll see…
The project has had the feel of watching grass grow lately, mostly because I have been spending a lot of time collecting and establishing potential food algae for the slugs, and then watching them grow. Nonetheless, there is beginning to be some motion.
For example, starting Spring semester (late January), I will have a couple of students starting some simple molecular experiments. Although the diet of Elysia clarki is well-characterized, that of the species we find in Baja California, E. diomedea, is still not known for certain. On the next trip to Bahia de los Angeles, I plan to collect some E. diomedea, and identify their food plants based on the DNA of the chloroplasts that they have stolen from their food. This kind of work is straightforward in a comfortable lab where one has access to liquid nitrogen and other luxuries. However, we will need to develop protocols that will work in the heat and limited resources of the field station in Mexico. So, we will use the semester to develop a protocol for extracting and purifying DNA that utilizes the simplest methods possible. Meantime, it will be necessary to put together reading lists on the biology of Elysia and methods of DNA extraction so that we can hit the ground running.
The animal care system is also evolving. As I described a while ago, I have been lucky enough to get hefty samples of a few varieties of hair algae such as Bryopsis and Derbesia from local aquarists. The trick has been to get enough growth to maintain a self-sustaining supply of food. Although filling a tank with algae, sticking it into a window, and dumping hefty amounts of ammonia and phosphate into it produced decent results, it was not very stable.
Instead, I have added a 20 gallon tank devoted to growing algae to the slug culture system. The fancy hydroponics light gives a great spectrum for growth, but the strong red-pink quality of the light is not the most pleasing. There are a couple of species of hair algae, plus a tub of marine sand for macroalgae that need a substrate. To take advantage of the automated dosing of NO3, Ca and HCO3, it is plumbed into the rest of the system. Dosing of NO3 has already been increased a few times to keep up with the growth of the algae.
In other news, the controller that currently controls the lights, temperature and pH will soon be replaced by a newer, cloud-based model. This will allow remote monitoring of temperature, pH, and power use, as well as sensing moisture under the tanks in case of leaks. It can send email alerts in case of equipment failure, and should help prevent loss of animals or damage to property.
The eggs hatched last Monday (10/5/15), but I am finally getting around to posting. Assuming you have a little imagination, you should be able to see some little veligers whizzing around among the very wiggly embryos. The hatchery was not ready for them (they only took about 5 days to hatch), so I just added the veligers directly to the growout tank and hoped for the best. Whatever this species is, it could be very useful in the lab to have embryonic development done in less than a week.
Meantime, I have added some fresh Bryopsis from a local reef tank, so maybe the E. clarki will be in the mood to lay eggs soo.
Two days later, the embryos have started to spin in their eggs. The video below has been filtered somewhat to reduce noise, so they appear to be moving a little more slowly than in the raw data. Have a look in full screen mode for the complete Elysia-in-motion experience.
A little over a month down the road, the little slugs that rode in with the last batch of macroalgae are still pumping out eggs. At some point, I will really need to figure out the actual species, rather than referring to them (probably erroneously) as E. papillosa. Always more to do than time to do it.
Here is the young lady laying eggs this morning. No scale, but she is probably about 4 cm at this point. Note that the egg mass is different from the tidy coil seen in a previous clutch, seen here.
If past experience holds true, the eggs will hatch within about 5 days, which is a lot faster than the larger E. clarki. In order to compare the developmental sequences of the two species, I have started taking photos of the little guys’ development.
Below is a shot at about 20X, showing a couple of strands.
At higher magnification.
Given their rapid development, it will be interesting to see what they look like tomorrow. For a sense of scale, try to compare the eggs in the micrographs to the barely resolvable dots in the egg cluster as the eggs are being deposited.
Although they will eat a number of algal species, Elysia clarki strongly prefer Bryopsis, which is a feathery filamentous alga considered by most aquarists to be a pestilent nuisance. For the past year, I have been benefiting from the struggles of a local reefkeeper who has had a plague of the stuff in his 500 gallon system. Alas, through rigorous reduction of phosphate levels, his battle with Bryopsis seems to be coming to an end.
That sent me into a panic. Well, more like mild anxiety. Even though it has been possible to maintain my own stock of Bryopsis, it had started to run low. Hard to believe, but I am having trouble growing enough of a nuisance alga. In my defense, it is a bit of a trick to grow one form of plague without another taking over. I was starting to be concerned that the slugs would not be ready to lay eggs if they ran out of their favorite food and had to make do with other algae.
Fortunately (for me), another WAMAS member is in the midst of a battle with Bryopsis. It required a trip to Virginia, but I returned with a bucket full of soft, feathery algae. It seems finer than the variety I was getting from the previous source.
Nonetheless, the slugs are lapping the stuff up. Despite their reputation for slow movement, slugs are pretty good at moving around when they have appropriate motivation.
The adult above dug right in. As did the juvenile, below. Up to her rhinophores in Bryopsis.
Below is a shot of her cruising around, before having found the food pile.
Now that they have been fattening up on algae, they have taken on a much deeper green color. Will have to post some before and after photos next.
Recent Comments