In the previous post, I mentioned that there are at least five species of slugs in Box of Slugs 2.0. Four Elysia species were described in that post, but the one in the picture below is odd enough to warrant its own spotlight. This tiny beauty was clearly different from the Elysia, having branched rhinophores, and being adorned with cerata, outgrowths from the dorsal surface. It is more reclusive than the others, rarely making its presence known except for the occasional appearance in the early morning before lights-on. It is also very quick to become scarce, diving behind or into a clump of algae, if the lights come on when it is out and about. These behaviors, combined with my limitations as a photographer, explains the quality of the images so far.
When I first saw this creature, with its frilly cerata, I believed it to be a nudibranch. In general, marine aquarists are not pleased about seeing nudibranchs in their tanks. They tend to be specialist predators, focusing on one or a few species of prey items. Prey can be sponges, bryozoans, corals, or even other molluscs. As a result, nudibranchs can either be pests, destroying prized species, or, more likely, will starve to death in the absence of preferred foods
I had removed the slug to a small container, and was debating its fate, when Joanna made it clear that killing the slug was the less preferred option. Realizing that I did not yet know what I was dealing with, I took a few macro shots and started to go through field guides. Looking more closely, I realized that it was not a nudibranch, but a sacoglossan like Elysia. The lack of external gills on the posterior end (see photo below) mean that this animal is not a nudibranch, and the combination of cerata and branched rhinophores suggest that it is a species of Cyerce. Cyerce antillensis comes from the right part of the world to have ridden in on some macroalgae, and it lives on Penicillus, so it is a promising candidate. It is a variable species, and is the closest match I have found so far, but I have not yet seen a photo of Cyerce antillensis that is convincingly similar to our slug. In any case, the slug was returned to the Box of Slugs as a harmless curiosity.
The photos above and below show a body filled with green stuff, presumably chloroplasts removed from its food plant(s). According to the literature, however, Cyerce is not kleptoplastic.
With time and luck, opportunities for better photographs will present themselves. Who knows, there may even be enough of them to start seeing young ones.
An interesting exercise in how parsimony and preconceptions can mislead.
As the most recent posts suggest, slugs have been added, and have appeared, in Box of Slugs 2.0. Here is a streamlined sequence of events from my point of view.
The tank was set up, and slugs (E. clarki) & macroalgae (Penicillus, Udotea and Avrainvillea) were purchased from a collector. A few days after the new organisms settled in, we left for a little over a week. After we got back (as described here), not only were there some E. clarki eggs masses (one of which I watched being deposited), but also some tiny sluglets. Logical conclusion: the small slugs were baby E. clarki. The timing seemed a bit off, because the youngsters appeared a little too soon based on the incubation times observed for E. clarki in Box of Slugs 1.0 (about 16-17 days), but [mutter about temperature or previously deposited eggs or something].
As the little guys grew, they looked like they might be more than one species (see this post), and the one that looked most closely like E. clarki stilll did not look quite right. Maybe the big, ruffly parapodia develop as they mature? Are they really laying eggs at such a small size? Although I did not know what baby E. clarki looked like, suspicions were becoming aroused.
It all came into focus over the past week, as a sizable cohort of baby slugs appeared and started to grow quickly on a diet of Bryopsis. What do baby E. clarki look like? It turns out that they look like little teeny versions of their parents, complete with broad, ruffly parapodia and loosely rolled rhinophores.
No doubt, they look like tiny versions of the adults lumbering around the tank. They may have hatched from eggs laid by one of the residents, or from a clutch of almost fully developed eggs that I added a week or so back.
It turns out that, rather than the two species of slugs that were purchased from KP Aquatics, we have five. The adult clarki and crispata that I purchased are the real deal. Both species have the same general shape, with ruffly parapodia and loosely rolled rhinophores. Both are very fond of Bryopsis, at least in captivity.
E. clarki are uniformly green with white spots, and seem to grow and thrive better than the other species in their captive algal world.
E. crispata may be the the glamour slug of the tank. The bluish hue and large white spots make these slugs very eye-catching.
After looking at a lot of photos, especially at the Sea Slug Forum, I have identified the other species with some confidence. What I had originally identified as E. clarki is most likely E. papillosa. Looking at it side by side with E. clarki in the photo below, it is clearly not the same species. The parapodia of E. papillosa are much smaller and simpler, the rhinophores are pinkish and more tightly rolled, and the spots are smaller and more sparse. Unlike clarki and crispata, papillosa does not appear particularly fond of Bryopsis, preferring to hang out and feed on Penicillus most of the time. Another interesting difference is that E. papillosa uses its parapodia to swim from time to time. Despite hundreds of hours of observations of E. clarki, including the slugs floating in the water column, I have never seen them use their parapodia for propulsion. Maybe the less elaborate parapodia are more useful for swimming (think using a square dancing skirt vs a wedding dress).
The final Elysia species, which has very small parapodia, is presumed to be E. tuca. The bright green coloration, the white rhinophores and the white areas on the head, along with the small parapodia, are anatomical features of E. tuca. Combined with the species tendency to spend its time on Halimeda and its common occurrence in the Florida Keys, where I assume the algae were collected by KP Aquatics, and it’s a pretty good bet that these are E. tuca, and that they rode in with the first shipment of macroalgae. They show no interest in Bryopsis, spending most of their time associated with Halimeda, and making the occasional trip to Penicillus or Avrainvillea.
The different species wander around the tank constantly, but tend to focus on their food plants.
As far as I can tell, they do not interact socially. In the photo below, E. tuca crawls over E. crispata as it would any other obstacle.
So, rather than the two species of Elysia I purchased, there are four species. On top of that, at least a few of them are reproducing successfully. Not bad.
But didn’t I mention five species? There is one more sacoglossan species in the tank that has not been discussed. Although the species above are interesting enough in their own right, the final species warrants a post of its own.
Stay tuned.
Things have been going quite well in the in-line refugium known as Box of Slugs 2.0. Although it might not be considered a plus in most aquaria, algae have been very successful in the new tank. A less sophisticated aquarist might dare to call the tank an eyesore, yet the slugs could not be happier. Here are a few of the youngsters grazing on what I think is Derbesia.
Indeed, it has been a great time for the little guys, and they have been growing like the little slug-weed chimeras that they are. Many have gone beyond the twiggy little worm stage to looking and behaving like proper small slugs.
At this size, I am still unsure that they are all E. clarki. The one below is most likely E. tuca almost looks like E. chlorotica, or maybe E. subornata, and does not have much in the way of parapodia.
The small slugs below look more convincingly like the adults in the tank. Rolled rhinophores, parapodia starting to ruffle, chloroplasts throughout the body, including the foot, all point to the little guys being the common lettuce slug of the Keys.
Will they get spots and ruffles like the purported parents? Time will tell. [note added later: these are not young E. clarki, as a few of the edits above indicate]
They still have a long way to go to get to full size, as can be seen in this photo of the adult from the photo above grazing on Bryopsis while a youngster wanders about.
One of the more interesting developments is the appearance of very small, dense egg masses in Box of Slugs 2. At first, I attributed them to the small herd of E. crispata that arrived a few weeks ago, since I have no idea of the size or appearance of their egg masses. I need to start putting a ruler or something in the photo for scale, but this clutch is about the size of the first coil of the a standard E. Clarki mass from Box of Slugs 1 (shown here, for example), and the little embryos are packed much more tightly.
As mentioned above, I thought these were eggs from crispata, but was thrown for a bit of a loop when I saw one of the youngsters curved around the mass as if laying them. Can they really be mature enough to lay eggs? I collected the mass below, and am documenting the embryos’ development. They are definitely fertile, as indicated by the classic circling movements inside their eggs, and maybe this time I can get a brood to mature in a controlled environment and find out which species they turn into. Stay tuned.
Things do not get a whole lot more slug-errific around here than they were this week. There have been exciting developments in both boxes of slugs, and it feels like spring will be a good time for Elysia here in Maryland.
In Box of Slugs 1, the group of E. clarki that arrived from Carolina Biological in December has fattened up and started laying eggs. I hope this perfectly coiled mass symbolizes the beginning of a productive time for this setup. With a few new ideas, I think we should be producing small slugs by the dozen.
Box of Slugs 2 is has been even more fun. The miniature slugs have been growing rapidly, moving quickly from tiny wiggly objects to small versions of their parents.The one below is looking very much like a proper E. clarki.
Nonetheless, they are still babies. For a sense of scale, here is one of the youngsters perched above mom/dad on a Penicillus plant.
Finally, and possibly most exciting, KP Aquatics let me know that the had collected some E. crispata this week. As the project has developed, I have tried to find suppliers who can provide me with the three North American species, E. clarki, E. crispata, and E. diomedea. In the past, I have ordered “lettuce sea slugs” from various suppliers, and always received E. clarki. Don’t get me wrong, E. clarki is a wonderful species, but I was a bit frustrated that the suppliers did not seem very interested in which species they were shipping.
That was not the case with KP Aquatics. After they sent the first batch of clarki, which produced the lovely offspring pictured above, I corresponded with Kara, who seemed very interested in the differences between the species. It was refreshing that they truly wanted to understand the organisms that they collect.
So, Philipp emailed me this week that they had five crispata, and I decided I had to have them. Shipping went fine, despite the frigid temperatures, and they settled into the smorgasbord of Penicillus, Halimeda, Avrainvillea and hair algae without a hitch. Although I should love all slugs equally, I must say the new kids are the real beauties of the collection.
As always, there has been plenty to keep us busy after our return from Bonaire, but we have had a little time to look in on the Boxes of slugs. Seahorses and slugs are doing their thing in B.o.S. 1.0, but no new egg masses or babies as yet.
In Box of Slugs 2.0, the new plants have been enjoying the nutrients and growing well. Unsurprisinlgly, hair algae (looks like Derbesia) has also been spreading exuberantly. Not great for aesthetics, but good for Elysia.
One nice development was the presence of a small egg cluster that appeared by the time we were back. Age is not known, but they will presumably hatch within the week. Not collecting these guys, because the tank may be conducive to the settling and maturation of little sluglets. Why would I think that? Keep scrolling down.
When I glanced at the tank yesterday, I saw some interesting shapes, and thought “goodness me, could it be?” Indeed it was, little wiggly guys with parapodia, rhinophores and chloroplasts! There appeared to be at least half a dozen of them.
Unfortunately, I only had the Canon Powershot SX30, which is unbeatable for taking photos of wildlife from a distance, but rather poor for macro photography. Will bring the Canon G12, home from the office to get some better photos. .
A little math suggests that their eggs may have ridden in on one of the plants, rather than being deposited by the current residents. On average eggs from Box of Slugs 1.0 take about 16 days (16.7) to hatch, and then settle after another 3 – 4 days. The guys pictured above appear to be at least another week beyond that. The parents arrived on 1/5/15, and the babies were visible on 1/25, less than 3 weeks later, which seems like breakneck speed. The water temperature is a little warmer for this setup than for B.o.S. 1.0 (~25 C vs ~23 C), but it still seems a stretch for the eggs to be deposited, hatch, settle, and then grow to the point of being miniature slugs in such a short time.
Anyway, it is an exciting development, and I hope that the youngsters will avoid the hazards of tank life and grow to maturity.
As described in Slugkeeping FAQ, one excellent way of having a box of slugs is to set it up as a refugium (a fish-free zone that allows proliferation of plants and small organisms) in line with a marine aquarium. The plants can make use of the nutrients (phosphate and nitrate) produced by the fish and food, reducing their concentrations in the display aquarium while providing food plants for the slugs. Further, supplementation of calcium and carbonate for corals will also support growth of calcareous algae, such as Halimeda or Penicillus. The only concern is avoiding pumps or strainers that the slugs will inevitably encounter and be killed.
A 27 gallon cube (20″ wide X 18″ deep X 20″ tall) was a good fit for the available space, and I found a used stand that fit with the decor reasonable well. To accommodate input from the coral reef tank, and overflow back to the sump, I drilled a couple of holes in the back, and added bulkheads plus fittings.Because the flow through the tank will be very low, there is no need for fancy overflow systems.
Then it was just a matter of adding sand for the plants. For a little topography, I added a large-ish piece of base rock. In case flow from the main tank circulation fails, there is also a Hydor heater/pump combination to act as a backup. It has a sponge attachment for the intake that ensures slug safety.
Nice thing about adding a tank to an established system is that it is ready for inhabitants. KP Aquatics (formerly SeaLife Inc) sent me a nice batch of macroalgae, and I indulged myself in a few photosynthetic gorgonians as well. The Elysia clarki settled in well.
From time to time, one of the slugs starts to shrink and become pale, despite appearing to have normal appetite and behavior. Ultimately, the slug disappears without a trace. My assumption is that this signals senescence, and the greatly reduced slug becomes food for the boisterous collection of detritivores that dwells in the Box of Slugs.
Over the past few weeks, the remaining slugs have all apparently succumbed. Although it’s a bit sad, one does not expect the little guys to live forever, especially since their ages on arrival were completely unknown. Living 5.5 months seems a bit short, but not ridiculously so. The production of a couple of clutches of eggs per slug per week for a few months may also have contributed to their demise. They appeared to have happy little slug lives, and taught us much.
There are new adults on the way from Carolina Biological, plans on the horizon for Box of Slugs II in a new location, and an upgraded culture facility (Box of Slugs 1.1) here at USG. Stay tuned for all that.
The slug colony, a.k.a. Box of Slugs, has been doing pretty well overall. The slugs have been eating, growing, mating, and laying eggs. The eggs have been hatching, and the veligers have settled as baby slugs. Of the many broods that have been deposited over the past few months, I have collected and hatched about a dozen, so producing juvenile slugs has become routine.
What has been puzzling and frustrating is that the baby slugs are not maturing beyond the first few days. They crawl happily among the macroalgae in the little dishes, but never seem to take in chloroplasts or develop parapodia or rhinophores. I have offered them both Bryopsis and Derbesia, two algal species that are supposedly their favorite first foods, and they appear to be attempting to eat, but the little guys never turn green.
A few observations may or may not be relevant. First, dumping too much Bryopsis into one of their dishes appears to cause immediate and permanent cessation of activity. The simplest interpretation is that, even though Elysia species have been reported to take advantage of the defensive compounds produced by their food plants, too much is simply too much. Also, even though I dip the algae in distilled water for 30-60 seconds before adding it to the cultures, the occasional amphipod, copepod or nasty looking worm sneaks in and may cause a ruckus.
In the end, there are hypotheses to be tested. In order of decreasing likelihood:
1. I am using the wrong food plants. Even though I am feeding species of Bryopsis and Derbesia, the algae were collected from aquaria, so their origin is unknown. I know that the parents love the species of Bryopsis that I am providing, but it may be more difficult for the juveniles to feed on.
2. Temperature. I am currently not controlling their temperature. They hatch on a bookshelf at about 23 degrees C, and then their dishes are moved to the top of the Box of Slugs to provide light when the algae are added. The temperature is probably a bit higher under the LEDs, but I have not measured it.
3. Light. They go from low to relatively high illumination when food plants are added. Maybe they don’t like the light. The little slugs move around happily enough, but who knows.
4. Chemistry. Aside from keeping salinity at 1.025, I do not test or change the water in the crystallization dishes. Given the tiny biomass and the presence of healthy algae, the possibility of waste nitrogen or phosphorous becoming a problem seems slim. Maybe they need to have their water changed to get rid of chemical secreted by the algae?
With finals almost over, I can give some thought to how to separate the variables and get past the roadblock.
Apologies for the radio silence, but little has been happening this past week. The most promising batch of baby slugs has largely disappeared while I was away for the holiday, although the next batch looks excellent. The November 12 clutch, which I have been documenting since it was deposited, has hatched. Unfortunately, I have not found an easy way to video veligers that refuse to stay in one field of view for any length of time. They will probably settle tomorrow, and will be photographed then.
Baby ponies have been hard to find. I rarely see them, but this little one appeared briefly before I left last week. A little more color perhaps, but quite the skinny little fish.
Tomorrow will be a good day for a little maintenance.
Recent Comments