The slug colony is squeaking along toward full function. The next batch of plants arrived from KP Aquatics this week, so the broodstock and growout tanks are smorgasbords of macroalgae.
With the growout tank ready, I added the first youngsters from Box of Slugs 2. This batch consisted of two medium-sized and one small girl, and all seemed almost jubilant once they entered the tank.
The two largest could be twins.
The little one is keeping an eye on big sister.
Moving the next generation into the system here should take a little pressure off the fodder in BoS 2. At some point I should get a better idea of the algae requirements on a per-slug basis.
After months of planning and anticipation, the new slug facility is up and running at Shady Grove. The original “system,” if you could call it that, was a 20 gallon long tank with an Evergrow LED fixture to supply light and a Hydor Ekip thermopump to provide heat and circulation. It worked fine in terms of egg production, and the adults seemed quite happy. The new system has a separate growout tank for baby slugs, a sump for equipment such as the heater and an automated topoff system to make up for evaporation. It will also have a hatchery tank, in which the eggs and veligers will have constant circulation of fresh, pest-free water.
After the shelf was built and painted, the system was set up in one of the lab spaces (no carpet, spill kits at the ready). For this test, only the 15 gallon broodstock tank and sump were used.
Then water was added…
The plumbing and hardware appeared to function adequately, so it was ready to be set up in the office. The rack was moved into place and the sump was filled from the Bryopsis growout tank (photo below). For the final fill, I waited until I could get started first thing in the morning, so that I would have most of a day to keep an eye on it in case of unanticipated redirection of flow (i.e., flooding).
Then it was time to commit. Water, sand, plants, and slugs all had to be moved in an orderly way. In an hour or so, everyone was settled in their new homes. The seahorse had been moved to Box of Slugs 2 to minimize her stress, but all of the adult slugs, the broodstock, took their place in the 15 gallon tank on top.
So there it is. The main slug tanks, for adult broodstock and growing youngsters, now have dividers to keep the Bryopsis from completely overwhelming the other algae. Heater, topoff valve, and pump are in the sump, where they can’t bother the slugs. Flow from the sump to the rest of the system passes through a reactor filled with activated carbon, to prevent possible inhibition of slug growth by secretions from the algae. It should also reduce any odors produced by a system packed with seaweed. Having a sump makes it easier to dose with calcium, bicarbonate, nitrate and phosphate without worrying that some is getting dumped on the slugs’ heads. As an added bonus, the tank is not taking up valuable real estate in the middle of my office.
The slugs seem happy in their new home. They are exploring, feeding, and starting their mornings by basking in the sun.
Now that phase 1 of B.o.S 1.1 is finished, I will be adding more macroalgae and move some of the the E. clarki youngsters from Box of Slugs 2 into the growout tank. The final phase will be to get the hatchery on line, to have more control of the timing and numbers of baby slugs.
The Elysia literature is rich, varied, and growing constantly. From time to time, I will highlight a recent paper that strikes my fancy.
The paper of the moment is a recent review by de Vries and his colleagues that, from my point of view, demonstrates how the field of kleptoplasty in sacoglossans is maturing as a growing number of researchers apply diverse methods and approaches. Although I will summarize some of the highlights below, it is worth reading this short, nicely written paper for yourself (de Vries et al., 2014, Acta Soc Bot Pol 83: 415-421)
This paper illustrates a larger point that I have had to learn repeatedly during my career: as much as possible, one needs to look at the data and the biology, unfiltered by the way you think it should work. Almost invariably, one generates a mental model to organize one’s observations about a biological system. This model forms the basis for additional experiments, which can potentially support the model, but which almost always show you how naïve and simple your initial model was. The model is essential to focus one’s thinking, but any biological system is more complex (and therefore more interesting) than your limited human mind can imagine. So, there comes a time to listen to what the biology is telling you, and to think very hard about the next generation of models.
The paper by deVries and colleagues highlights that the field is at a point where researchers can, and must, think more deeply about the mechanisms and functions of kleptoplasty. They lay out a series of fundamental unanswered questions regarding the biology of solar sacoglossans.
The paper ends with a quote from Ed Yong that echoes my introduction to this blog post, but is much more eloquent: “Science is about resisting the easy pull of conclusions. It’s about testing stories that seem like they should be right to see if they actually are right.”
As the study of kleptoplasty evolves from “gosh, wow, a photosynthetic slug” to a more complex and interesting view of the animals’ biology, the questions become more focused and more sophisticated. It will be fun to watch, and with a little time and effort, participate in the process.
An interesting exercise in how parsimony and preconceptions can mislead.
As the most recent posts suggest, slugs have been added, and have appeared, in Box of Slugs 2.0. Here is a streamlined sequence of events from my point of view.
The tank was set up, and slugs (E. clarki) & macroalgae (Penicillus, Udotea and Avrainvillea) were purchased from a collector. A few days after the new organisms settled in, we left for a little over a week. After we got back (as described here), not only were there some E. clarki eggs masses (one of which I watched being deposited), but also some tiny sluglets. Logical conclusion: the small slugs were baby E. clarki. The timing seemed a bit off, because the youngsters appeared a little too soon based on the incubation times observed for E. clarki in Box of Slugs 1.0 (about 16-17 days), but [mutter about temperature or previously deposited eggs or something].
As the little guys grew, they looked like they might be more than one species (see this post), and the one that looked most closely like E. clarki stilll did not look quite right. Maybe the big, ruffly parapodia develop as they mature? Are they really laying eggs at such a small size? Although I did not know what baby E. clarki looked like, suspicions were becoming aroused.
It all came into focus over the past week, as a sizable cohort of baby slugs appeared and started to grow quickly on a diet of Bryopsis. What do baby E. clarki look like? It turns out that they look like little teeny versions of their parents, complete with broad, ruffly parapodia and loosely rolled rhinophores.
No doubt, they look like tiny versions of the adults lumbering around the tank. They may have hatched from eggs laid by one of the residents, or from a clutch of almost fully developed eggs that I added a week or so back.
It turns out that, rather than the two species of slugs that were purchased from KP Aquatics, we have five. The adult clarki and crispata that I purchased are the real deal. Both species have the same general shape, with ruffly parapodia and loosely rolled rhinophores. Both are very fond of Bryopsis, at least in captivity.
E. clarki are uniformly green with white spots, and seem to grow and thrive better than the other species in their captive algal world.
E. crispata may be the the glamour slug of the tank. The bluish hue and large white spots make these slugs very eye-catching.
After looking at a lot of photos, especially at the Sea Slug Forum, I have identified the other species with some confidence. What I had originally identified as E. clarki is most likely E. papillosa. Looking at it side by side with E. clarki in the photo below, it is clearly not the same species. The parapodia of E. papillosa are much smaller and simpler, the rhinophores are pinkish and more tightly rolled, and the spots are smaller and more sparse. Unlike clarki and crispata, papillosa does not appear particularly fond of Bryopsis, preferring to hang out and feed on Penicillus most of the time. Another interesting difference is that E. papillosa uses its parapodia to swim from time to time. Despite hundreds of hours of observations of E. clarki, including the slugs floating in the water column, I have never seen them use their parapodia for propulsion. Maybe the less elaborate parapodia are more useful for swimming (think using a square dancing skirt vs a wedding dress).
The final Elysia species, which has very small parapodia, is presumed to be E. tuca. The bright green coloration, the white rhinophores and the white areas on the head, along with the small parapodia, are anatomical features of E. tuca. Combined with the species tendency to spend its time on Halimeda and its common occurrence in the Florida Keys, where I assume the algae were collected by KP Aquatics, and it’s a pretty good bet that these are E. tuca, and that they rode in with the first shipment of macroalgae. They show no interest in Bryopsis, spending most of their time associated with Halimeda, and making the occasional trip to Penicillus or Avrainvillea.
The different species wander around the tank constantly, but tend to focus on their food plants.
As far as I can tell, they do not interact socially. In the photo below, E. tuca crawls over E. crispata as it would any other obstacle.
So, rather than the two species of Elysia I purchased, there are four species. On top of that, at least a few of them are reproducing successfully. Not bad.
But didn’t I mention five species? There is one more sacoglossan species in the tank that has not been discussed. Although the species above are interesting enough in their own right, the final species warrants a post of its own.
Stay tuned.
Things have been going quite well in the in-line refugium known as Box of Slugs 2.0. Although it might not be considered a plus in most aquaria, algae have been very successful in the new tank. A less sophisticated aquarist might dare to call the tank an eyesore, yet the slugs could not be happier. Here are a few of the youngsters grazing on what I think is Derbesia.
Indeed, it has been a great time for the little guys, and they have been growing like the little slug-weed chimeras that they are. Many have gone beyond the twiggy little worm stage to looking and behaving like proper small slugs.
At this size, I am still unsure that they are all E. clarki. The one below is most likely E. tuca almost looks like E. chlorotica, or maybe E. subornata, and does not have much in the way of parapodia.
The small slugs below look more convincingly like the adults in the tank. Rolled rhinophores, parapodia starting to ruffle, chloroplasts throughout the body, including the foot, all point to the little guys being the common lettuce slug of the Keys.
Will they get spots and ruffles like the purported parents? Time will tell. [note added later: these are not young E. clarki, as a few of the edits above indicate]
They still have a long way to go to get to full size, as can be seen in this photo of the adult from the photo above grazing on Bryopsis while a youngster wanders about.
One of the more interesting developments is the appearance of very small, dense egg masses in Box of Slugs 2. At first, I attributed them to the small herd of E. crispata that arrived a few weeks ago, since I have no idea of the size or appearance of their egg masses. I need to start putting a ruler or something in the photo for scale, but this clutch is about the size of the first coil of the a standard E. Clarki mass from Box of Slugs 1 (shown here, for example), and the little embryos are packed much more tightly.
As mentioned above, I thought these were eggs from crispata, but was thrown for a bit of a loop when I saw one of the youngsters curved around the mass as if laying them. Can they really be mature enough to lay eggs? I collected the mass below, and am documenting the embryos’ development. They are definitely fertile, as indicated by the classic circling movements inside their eggs, and maybe this time I can get a brood to mature in a controlled environment and find out which species they turn into. Stay tuned.
The slug colony, a.k.a. Box of Slugs, has been doing pretty well overall. The slugs have been eating, growing, mating, and laying eggs. The eggs have been hatching, and the veligers have settled as baby slugs. Of the many broods that have been deposited over the past few months, I have collected and hatched about a dozen, so producing juvenile slugs has become routine.
What has been puzzling and frustrating is that the baby slugs are not maturing beyond the first few days. They crawl happily among the macroalgae in the little dishes, but never seem to take in chloroplasts or develop parapodia or rhinophores. I have offered them both Bryopsis and Derbesia, two algal species that are supposedly their favorite first foods, and they appear to be attempting to eat, but the little guys never turn green.
A few observations may or may not be relevant. First, dumping too much Bryopsis into one of their dishes appears to cause immediate and permanent cessation of activity. The simplest interpretation is that, even though Elysia species have been reported to take advantage of the defensive compounds produced by their food plants, too much is simply too much. Also, even though I dip the algae in distilled water for 30-60 seconds before adding it to the cultures, the occasional amphipod, copepod or nasty looking worm sneaks in and may cause a ruckus.
In the end, there are hypotheses to be tested. In order of decreasing likelihood:
1. I am using the wrong food plants. Even though I am feeding species of Bryopsis and Derbesia, the algae were collected from aquaria, so their origin is unknown. I know that the parents love the species of Bryopsis that I am providing, but it may be more difficult for the juveniles to feed on.
2. Temperature. I am currently not controlling their temperature. They hatch on a bookshelf at about 23 degrees C, and then their dishes are moved to the top of the Box of Slugs to provide light when the algae are added. The temperature is probably a bit higher under the LEDs, but I have not measured it.
3. Light. They go from low to relatively high illumination when food plants are added. Maybe they don’t like the light. The little slugs move around happily enough, but who knows.
4. Chemistry. Aside from keeping salinity at 1.025, I do not test or change the water in the crystallization dishes. Given the tiny biomass and the presence of healthy algae, the possibility of waste nitrogen or phosphorous becoming a problem seems slim. Maybe they need to have their water changed to get rid of chemical secreted by the algae?
With finals almost over, I can give some thought to how to separate the variables and get past the roadblock.
Apologies for the radio silence, but little has been happening this past week. The most promising batch of baby slugs has largely disappeared while I was away for the holiday, although the next batch looks excellent. The November 12 clutch, which I have been documenting since it was deposited, has hatched. Unfortunately, I have not found an easy way to video veligers that refuse to stay in one field of view for any length of time. They will probably settle tomorrow, and will be photographed then.
Baby ponies have been hard to find. I rarely see them, but this little one appeared briefly before I left last week. A little more color perhaps, but quite the skinny little fish.
Tomorrow will be a good day for a little maintenance.
Things are moving along, but nothing horribly exciting. Veligers are hatching and sluglets are settling. The brood from 10/30/14 has been rather successful, with a lot of baby slugs climbing out of their shells. I will feel better when I see rhinophores sticking out of their heads and chloroplasts in their bellies, hiopefully by the weekend. Meantime, here is one of the cohort climbing on a Bryopsis branch.
Because the age of the eggs collected in the previous post is known with some precision, it was a good opportunity to document the time course of development. On day one, the embryos looked like balls of stuff, and did not move much. Below is a video of the eggs, but it may as well be a still.
However, within 5 days, things have really started to get moving. The embryos are starting to look like little veligers, and are spinning in their eggshells constantly. They still have at least 10 days before they hatch, so it seems like a bit of a waste of energy, but it may serve some purpose.
Recent Comments